Num. 1 | January-March 2023
Num. 2 | April-June 2023
Num. 3 | July-September 2023
Num. 3 | October-December 2023
Num. 1 | January-March 2022
Num. 2 | April-June 2022
Num. 3 | July-September 2022
Num. 4 | October-December 2022
Issue 3 of Neurosciences and History is now available. Don’t miss the opportunity to read our latest research articles on the history of neurology.
Browse Volume 12Issue 3 belongs to Volume 12, 2024.
Browse volumes and issues in the “latest issues” section
Guardar
Guardar
C. Nombela, E. Giné, F. de Castro
Neurosciences and History 2020;8(2):39-48
Type of article: ORIGINAL
AUTHORS
C. Nombela1,2, E. Giné3, F. de Castro4
1Department of Biological and Health Psychology. School of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
2Madrid Institute for Advanced Study, Madrid, Spain.
3Department of Cellular Biology. School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
4Cajal Institute-CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
ABSTRACT
Introduction. This study analyses the figure of Manuela Serra, who collaborated with the Nobel laureate Santiago Ramón y Cajal, as he himself noted in a list of collaborators and disciples in 1922, shortly before retiring.
Methods. We consulted the Legado Cajal (Instituto Cajal, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [CSIC]), the archive of the Junta de Ampliación de Estudios (CSIC), and the historical archive of the Universidad Central (Universidad Complutense de Madrid), and conducted interviews with the descendants of Manuela Serra and her sister Carmen Serra.
Results. Manuela Serra began working as a “preparadora” (laboratory technician) in the Laboratorio de Investigaciones Biológicas (today, Instituto Cajal) in 1919, and soon stood out for her “sharp intelligence.” In 1921, she published her only research article, which analysed gliofibrils in the spinal cord of frogs, illustrating mitosis in a mature astrocyte and the presence of microglia for the first time in amphibians. The study featured seven elegant illustrations by the author. During her time at the laboratory, Cajal acknowledged the quality of Serra’s scientific work on many occasions, as did the Junta de Ampliación de Estudios. Serra married in 1927 and ceased to conduct research.
Discussion. This study is intended to complement a previous work (Giné et al., 2019) on the women researchers among Cajal’s students, a subject not previously addressed in detail.
KEYWORDS
Neurohistological school, Spanish Neurological School, Cajal school, glia, women neuroscientists, Santiago Ramón y Cajal
Neurosciences and History 2020;8(2):39-48
Neurosciences and History
Archivo Histórico de la Sociedad Española de Neurología
C/ Casp, 172, 1A 08013 – Barcelona
Tlf.: +34 933426233.
E-mail: archivo@sen.org.es