Num. 1 | January-March 2023
Num. 2 | April-June 2023
Num. 3 | July-September 2023
Num. 3 | October-December 2023
Num. 1 | January-March 2022
Num. 2 | April-June 2022
Num. 3 | July-September 2022
Num. 4 | October-December 2022
Issue 3 of Neurosciences and History is now available. Don’t miss the opportunity to read our latest research articles on the history of neurology.
Browse Volume 12Issue 3 belongs to Volume 12, 2024.
Browse volumes and issues in the “latest issues” section
Guardar
Guardar
A. Díaz Díaz, A. Muñoz García
Neurosciences and History 2020;8(2):68-75
Type of article: REVIEW
AUTHORS
A. Díaz Díaz, A. Muñoz García
Department of Neurology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil (CHUIMI). Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
ABSTRACT
Introduction. The concept of epilepsia partialis continua (EPC) originated in Moscow in 1894, with the first description by Yakovlevich Kozhevnikov. While more than a century has passed, we still lack a universally accepted definition. This article presents a historical review of the concept.
Development. Kozhevnikov described EPC as constant, high-frequency muscle spasms limited to one part of the body. He accurately proposed that the cause was chronic focal cortical encephalitis with motor pathway involvement. Russian spring-summer encephalitis (a tick-borne disease) was discovered in 1937; the disease was frequently associated with EPC. At the time, “Kozhevnikov epilepsy” was thought only to be a typical manifestation of this infectious disease. Perpetuating this idea, a 1958 study by a group of Canadian scientists described persistent focal epilepsy secondary to chronic encephalitis in children, which was considered a new disease: Rasmussen encephalitis. Subsequently, numerous descriptions of patients led to the concept of EPC being redefined: it was differentiated from Rasmussen syndrome and all association with Kozhevnikov was eliminated. In more recent publications, a European multicentre study group for status epilepticus proposed that the concept should be expanded and subdivided according to the stage of progression. In contrast, the International League Against Epilepsy opted to simplify the concept, treating it as a type of continuous seizure.
Conclusions. Unlike the definition proposed by Kozhevnikov, EPC is now considered to be a type of focal epileptic seizure, rather than a type of epilepsy. This may be an overly simplistic view of such a complex disease with an equally complicated history.
KEYWORDS
Chronic encephalitis, cortical myoclonus, epilepsia partialis continua, focal motor status epilepticus, Kozhevnikov, Rasmussen
Neurosciences and History 2020;8(2):68-75
Neurosciences and History
Archivo Histórico de la Sociedad Española de Neurología
C/ Casp, 172, 1A 08013 – Barcelona
Tlf.: +34 933426233.
E-mail: archivo@sen.org.es