NAH
  • Home
  • About
    • Aims & scope
    • Editorial board
    • Presentation
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
      • Volume 1
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 2
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • issue 4
      • Volume 3
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 4
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 5
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 6
        • Issue 1
        • issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 7
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 8
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 9
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 10
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 11
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 12
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 13
        • Issue 1
  • Authors
    • Instructions
  • Reviewers
    • Instructions
    • Peer review process

Issue 2

Pain, neurology, and art. A look at the life and work of Frida Kahlo

Another perception

A critical review of Broca’s contribution on aphasia: from priority to Leborgne the hatter

Traumatic frontal lobe lesions in miners working at Montes de Triano in the late 19th century

EDITORIAL SECRETARY

Neurosciences and History

Archivo Histórico de la Sociedad Española de Neurología

C/ Casp, 172, 1A 08013 - Barcelona

E-mail: archivo@sen.org.es

  • Español (España)
  • English (United Kingdom)
SOCIALS
  • fab fa-facebook
  • fab fa-x-twitter
  • fab fa-youtube
  • fab fa-flickr
Image
Image
Image
Copyright © 2025 Neurosciences and History. Todos los derechos reservados.
NAH
  • Home
  • About
    • Aims & scope
    • Editorial board
    • Presentation
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
      • Volume 1
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 2
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • issue 4
      • Volume 3
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 4
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 5
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 6
        • Issue 1
        • issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 7
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 8
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 9
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 10
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 11
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 12
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • issue 3
        • Issue 4
      • Volume 13
        • Issue 1
  • Authors
    • Instructions
  • Reviewers
    • Instructions
    • Peer review process